Questions about example sentences with, and the definition and usage of "Sophistry"

Q: [Sophistry or nonsense by leftist panels of current affairs programs]


Political news pours in every day.

It's hard to know what the news means when you live a busy life, so people watch current affairs.

The life of a current affairs program is fairness, but broadcasters that claim to be public broadcasters are conservative panelists, such as former CEO Lee Joon-seok, former lawmaker Lee Eon-joo, and director Jang Seong-cheol, who criticize President Yoon Seok-yeol.

As a result, all the cast members are united in one mind and heart to ‘smash’ the current government.

This is why conservative supporters do not watch public broadcasting.




They have no choice but to watch current affairs pros such as 'This is Politics' and 'Doljikgu Show'.

These pros are still fun to watch because they balance the left and right panels, but it's not once or twice when you feel like you're about to explode.

It is because the leftist panels appearing there are defending CEO Lee Jae-myeong with ridiculous logic.

Attorney Jeon Soo-mi, who appeared a while ago, made an absurd remark, saying, 'The result of President Yoon Seok-yeol's oppression of the press' over the fact that the public opinion that the motion to arrest Lee Jae-myung was wrong was higher.




King Bokgi, who served as mayor of Asan, preached the sophistry that "due to the limited authority of the National Assembly member, we have no choice but to make inaccurate disclosures" about the drinking party in Cheongdam-dong that turned out to be Gura.

He even criticized Jeong Jin-woong, referring to the case of self-directed assault by prosecutor Jeong Jin-woong in an attempt to steal the prosecutor's cell phone at the time, saying, "Minister Han Dong-hoon was hospitalized at that time and was criticized."

However, it was Jung Jin-woong, the perpetrator, who was actually hospitalized. Han Dong-hoon, the victim of the incident, said, "What will happen to the prosecution if I am also hospitalized?"

//

On February 28, the Seoul Central District Prosecutor's Office indicted without detention those who were in charge of the security field during the previous regime, including Chief of Staff Noh Young-min, National Intelligence Service Director Suh Hoon, and Unification Minister Kim Yeon-cheol.

In November 2019, it was alleged that two fishermen who had escaped from North Korea were forcibly ordered to return to North Korea even though they expressed their intention to defect.

People in the Moon regime justified their actions by saying that the fishermen in question stated that they would return (to North Korea) even if they died.

However, looking at the video released after the regime change, this was not true.

When the police special forces who dragged them all the way to Panmunjom released their blindfolds, the fishermen who realized their situation only then sat down or tried to bang their heads against the wall, and fiercely resisted.



At this point, it would be right to admit wrongdoing, but in the middle of last year, when the controversy reignited with the release of the video, left-wing panels on Current Affairs Pro insisted that it was right to deport the fishermen to the North.

The reason is that they are the killers who killed 16 of these people on the same boat. But is it possible for two slender men to kill 16 people on a squid-fishing boat that isn't too big? Even if that is true, it is right to condemn it through a trial.

However, the Moon Jae-in regime exiled them to North Korea after a formal investigation, and even returned the fishing boat, which is essential to prove the murder charges.

If it is true that the murder took place inside the ship, there would have been numerous bloodstains there.

The words of attorney Jang Yoon-mi, who appeared as a current affairs pro panel, are still vivid in my memory.

She said, "Even if there was blood on it, it would have been washed away in seawater, so there would be no bloodstains left."

Is this really what a lawyer would say? Rumors circulated that fishermen sent to North Korea were soon executed, and since then the number of North Korean defectors trying to come to South Korea has decreased significantly.

Investigating this case is also essential from a humanitarian point of view.


Even now, seeing the leftist panels defending Lee Jae-myeong with the sophistry of 'Daejang-dong is Yoon Seok-yeol's gate', I suddenly become curious.

Why do they spread nonsense on the air that they don't even believe?

According to one political commentator, there is a system within the left that monitors the remarks of the current affairs panel, and only when good evaluations are received from there, can you be nominated for the next general election. Considering that a certain panel that drew conservative viewers' sighs in 'This is Politics' is expected to be nominated for a constituency in Seoul, there is credibility.


If so, this is a serious problem. It is because lawyers and professors sell their conscience for the badge of a member of the National Assembly, thereby deceiving the viewers.

Even if such people go to the National Assembly, can they become good lawmakers?


Just as we make criminals pay for their sins, let those who defend criminals and mislead public opinion be punished regardless of left and right. For a better political board.



//


The Democratic Party and its followers deserve to be called the root of evil or the axis of evil in our country.






bu doğru görünüyor mu?

Q: It's just a sophistry and an excuse to discriminate against other people, it's an enough reason to call him a racist. bu doğru görünüyor mu?

Q: They employ sophistry to make innocent people guilty for the sake of "rules" when they are grumpy. bu doğru görünüyor mu?