Questions about example sentences with, and the definition and usage of "Tagawa"

Q: Mr. Tagawa, remember the second law: a cartoon character has a personality of its own. If your cartoon character Norakuro bayoneted an enemy soldier who was waving a white flag, your little readers would surely be shocked and send you letters of protest." You are a brave and very gentle man, Norakuro. You shouldn't have done that!" This means that regardless of what you think as an author, there is a clear perception of Norakuro's personality among his fans. That's what I call the personality of a cartoon character. When people see Mickey pining for Walt, I don't think any Mickey fan would say, "Mickey would never do that!" They would think that it is perfectly natural for a well-raised child to love his father. In short, this pose of his perfectly follows what I define as the second law of cartoon characters.

[Continued to https://hinative.com/ja/questions/21277270] bu doğru görünüyor mu?

Q: Mr. Tagawa, this is where I want to start. This third law, "Cartoon characters have their own personalities," can conflict with the second law, "Cartoon characters are patents that can be applied to everything." Recall the fact that patents can be bought and sold. Suppose you invent and patent a new mousetrap or something like that, then someone else can buy it, or take it from you if you have to give it away for your debt. If Mickey Mouse is a patent, then someone could theoretically buy it from Walt if he agreed or had no choice but to agree.

[Continued to https://hinative.com/questions/21202799?locale=ja] bu doğru görünüyor mu?

Q: Mr. and Mrs. Tagawa, in the 21st century world that I come from, there is an amazing technology that allows us to search through a vast number of historical photos from around the world by a single keyword. If you use this technology to search for photos of Walt and Mickey together, from Mickey's debut in the movies to Walt's death in 1966, and even the statue created by the Disney entities after his death, you will find some interesting facts; Walt is always posed holding Mickey's hand, or Mickey is holding onto Walt. bu doğru görünüyor mu?

Q: Mr. Tagawa, you've seen this photo, right? That memorable photo of a smiling Walt Disney surrounded by lots of Mickey Mouse merchandise. Even those of us in Japan who had no knowledge or practical experience with American law could see that Mickey is treated as a patent and Walt is respected as an inventor, and that there must have been substantial royalty income from these Mickey products. [Contrinued to https://hinative.com/questions/21159221?locale=ja] bu doğru görünüyor mu?

Q: Look, Mr. Tagawa, did you ever think about what a cartoon character is in the first place? You conceived the popular children's comic strip "Norakuro," you've been serializing it, and you're a freelance artist, so it counts as your copyrighted work. But this is about the "Norakuro" comics. The main character Norakuro cannot be protected by copyright law. The idea of copyright was developed in Europe in the 19th century, and then legislated. Eventually, at the end of the 19th century, a new form of expression called the comic strip appeared in the American metropolis of New York. It was also covered by copyright law. However, in the 20th century, legal disputes about comic strip characters began to arise. This was because they found that the well-established idea of copyright law, which originated in the 19th century, could not cover these disputes, which rose in the 20th century. Incidentally, the idea of patents could not cover comic strip characters either. Patents are about inventions. Inventions imply products. Yellow Kid, Buster Brown, and your Norakuro are not products, are they? Also, comic strip characters are not real actors or performers, so you can't control them exclusively by signing a performance contract with them. [Continued to https://hinative.com/questions/21051131?locale=ja] bu doğru görünüyor mu?